2010.11.15 Part1[昂山素姬,鄧小平憑什麼取諾貝爾和平獎,梁振英的思維水平,串爆女童]

昂山素姬,鄧小平憑什麼取諾貝爾和平獎,梁振英的思維水平,串爆女童

2010年11月15日
主持：蕭若元,慢必,靳民知



Non-violent approach I think is about the most difficult approach in the world, especially nowadays where weapons are getting more and more powerful, and people get more dependent on weapons in order to get what they want. But we are convinced the non-violent approach is the best. We are convinced in long run it pays off even if the run is actually longer because it is a non-violent approach. For example, if we consider a country like India, which is very much influenced by Gandhi's non-violence philosophy. You can see how clear the military (is) kept away from politics. India has had many many political upheavals, and they have faced many problems, and many to face in the future. But I think the seed of non-violence planted before the independence has helped them a great deal in solving the problem in a democratic way as possible under the circumstances. So we want to keep the non-violent approach. We find that there is a vast difference in the attitude of a man with a gun in his hand and that of one without a gun in his hand. When a man doesn't have a gun in his hand, or a woman for the matter, he or she tries harder to use his or her mind, and sense of compassion and intelligence to work out a solution. But if you put a gun into the person's hand, the gun is always there to use so that the urge to depend more on intellectual consideration, (and) the urge to exercise one's intelligence and compassion will thus become much less. So we think the non-violent approach is the best for our country. We want to cut the vicious cycle that has gone on in Burma for some time, or people trying to change the political scene (under) the power of the gun.


By franzkafka



****************************************************************

利用非暴力方式從來都是最因難的,
尤其是現代武器變得越來越有力及人們對其依賴遂漸增加.
雖然如此,
我們仍然相信採用非暴戶方法是最好的.
時間已經證明這個理論是沒有錯.
我們舉個例子,
印度一路得到國父甘地的非暴力理論所影響下,
軍政係盡量分開.
印度已經經歷多次政治洗禮,
而且仍然面對多個問題,
但我覺得甘地之前撒下的種子
令到國民應盡量以民主方式解決問題,
所以我們要保持這個非暴力方式.
我們會發現人如果手上有槍時,
其思維會和沒有持槍的人有頗大分別.
如果這個人沒有槍時,
他個會較偏向會想清楚,
並且會以較聰明及較用情感去解決問題.
可是如果那人手上持有槍時,
這個人會偏向利用那支槍去直接解決該問題,
而並少利用自己智慧.
所以我們認為採用非暴力方法係最適合我們國家的.
我們要緬甸要儘量減少人們利用槍械
去改變政治前境這個惡性循環.

By mingkee

********************************************************
我認為非暴力方式是世上最困難的方式，
特別是現今武器愈來愈強勁，
人們更多倚倚靠武器來達成目的。
但我們相信非暴力方式是最好的，
我們相信長遠來說是有回報的，
雖然過程真的因為是非暴力方式而比較長。
舉個例，
如果考慮一個國家像印度的，
印度極大地受甘地的非暴力哲學影響。
你能見到軍方是如何清楚地遠離政治。
印度有非常多的騷動，
面對很多難題，
將來會面對更多的，
但我認為非暴力的種子早於獨立之前已根植，
這種子大大地幫助了印度人
在當時情況中用可能的民主方式來解決困難。
因此我們希望繼續用非暴力方式。
我們察覺到一個人手中有槍
與一個手中無槍的態度極大地不同。
當一個男人或女人手中沒有槍，
他會較努力嘗試用自己的思想、
同情心和智慧去弄出解決辦法。
但如果你交支槍去那人手中，
因槍已在那裡能被使用，
運用智慧和同情心的催迫因此而大大減弱。
因此我們認為非暴力方式對我們國家是最好的。
我們要緬甸要儘量減少人們利用槍械
去改變政治前境這個惡性循環.

By dreaming